↓ Skip to main content

Do subjective or objective cognitive measures better predict social network type among older adults?

Overview of attention for article published in Biodemography and Social Biology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do subjective or objective cognitive measures better predict social network type among older adults?
Published in
Biodemography and Social Biology, March 2022
DOI 10.1080/19485565.2022.2052711
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam R. Roth, Siyun Peng, Max E. Coleman, Liana G. Apostolova, Brea L. Perry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,829,084
of 22,053,184 outputs
Outputs from Biodemography and Social Biology
#149
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,110
of 341,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodemography and Social Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,053,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.