↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructive Techniques After Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructive Techniques After Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006040.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl J Brown, Darlene Fenech, Robin S McLeod

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Materials Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,396,627
of 12,617,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,509
of 10,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,382
of 267,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,617,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.