↓ Skip to main content

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1559 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1033 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003311.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Jacobs, Marie Berg, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow‐Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

Abstract

Newborn animal studies and pilot studies in humans suggest that mild hypothermia following peripartum hypoxia-ischaemia in newborn infants may reduce neurological sequelae without adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,033 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1017 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 133 13%
Student > Master 131 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 11%
Researcher 98 9%
Other 77 7%
Other 194 19%
Unknown 291 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 424 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 7%
Neuroscience 54 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 3%
Other 102 10%
Unknown 329 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#949,659
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,853
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,746
of 295,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.