↓ Skip to main content

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
714 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
555 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003311.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Jacobs, Marie Berg, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow-Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

Abstract

Newborn animal studies and pilot studies in humans suggest that mild hypothermia following peripartum hypoxia-ischaemia in newborn infants may reduce neurological sequelae without adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 524 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 17%
Student > Bachelor 75 14%
Researcher 72 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 13%
Other 59 11%
Other 185 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 322 58%
Unspecified 87 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 5%
Neuroscience 24 4%
Other 61 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#680,036
of 13,576,937 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,147
of 10,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,607
of 145,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,576,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.