↓ Skip to main content

Exercise training with negative pressure ventilation improves exercise capacity in patients with severe restrictive lung disease: a prospective controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise training with negative pressure ventilation improves exercise capacity in patients with severe restrictive lung disease: a prospective controlled study
Published in
Respiratory Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-14-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Chuan Ho, Horng-Chyuan Lin, Han-Pin Kuo, Li-Fei Chen, Te-Fang Sheng, Wen-Ching Jao, Chun-Hua Wang, Kang-Yun Lee

Abstract

Exercise training is of benefit for patients with restrictive lung disease. However, it tends to be intolerable for those with severe disease. We examined whether providing ventilatory assistance by using negative pressure ventilators (NPV) during exercise training is feasible for such patients and the effects of training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,417
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,933
of 204,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.