↓ Skip to main content

High-quality draft genome sequence of Sedimenticola selenatireducens strain AK4OH1T, a gammaproteobacterium isolated from estuarine sediment

Overview of attention for article published in Standards in Genomic Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-quality draft genome sequence of Sedimenticola selenatireducens strain AK4OH1T, a gammaproteobacterium isolated from estuarine sediment
Published in
Standards in Genomic Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40793-016-0191-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffany S. Louie, Donato Giovannelli, Nathan Yee, Priya Narasingarao, Valentin Starovoytov, Markus Göker, Hans-Peter Klenk, Elke Lang, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Tanja Woyke, Elisabetta Bini, Max M. Häggblom

Abstract

Sedimenticola selenatireducens strain AK4OH1(T) (= DSM 17993(T) = ATCC BAA-1233(T)) is a microaerophilic bacterium isolated from sediment from the Arthur Kill intertidal strait between New Jersey and Staten Island, NY. S. selenatireducens is Gram-negative and belongs to the Gammaproteobacteria. Strain AK4OH1(T) was the first representative of its genus to be isolated for its unique coupling of the oxidation of aromatic acids to the respiration of selenate. It is a versatile heterotroph and can use a variety of carbon compounds, but can also grow lithoautotrophically under hypoxic and anaerobic conditions. The draft genome comprises 4,588,530 bp and 4276 predicted protein-coding genes including genes for the anaerobic degradation of 4-hydroxybenzoate and benzoate. Here we report the main features of the genome of S. selenatireducens strain AK4OH1(T).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 25%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,461,180
of 9,726,146 outputs
Outputs from Standards in Genomic Sciences
#221
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,285
of 257,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Standards in Genomic Sciences
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,726,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.