You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prophylactic cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitor drugs for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013846.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Souvik Mitra, Courtney E Gardner, Abigale MacLellan, Tim Disher, Danielle M Styranko, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Stefan Kuhle, Bradley C Johnston, Jon Dorling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 67% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,221,950
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,574
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,456
of 448,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.