↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of Ebola virus: Insights from the 2013–2016 epidemic

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
242 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The evolution of Ebola virus: Insights from the 2013–2016 epidemic
Published in
Nature, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Holmes, Gytis Dudas, Andrew Rambaut, Kristian G. Andersen, Holmes, Edward C, Dudas, Gytis, Rambaut, Andrew, Andersen, Kristian G

Abstract

The 2013-2016 epidemic of Ebola virus disease in West Africa was of unprecedented magnitude and changed our perspective on this lethal but sporadically emerging virus. This outbreak also marked the beginning of large-scale real-time molecular epidemiology. Here, we show how evolutionary analyses of Ebola virus genome sequences provided key insights into virus origins, evolution and spread during the epidemic. We provide basic scientists, epidemiologists, medical practitioners and other outbreak responders with an enhanced understanding of the utility and limitations of pathogen genomic sequencing. This will be crucially important in our attempts to track and control future infectious disease outbreaks.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Brazil 3 2%
France 2 1%
China 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 154 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 12 7%
Other 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Unspecified 9 5%
Other 37 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#30,771
of 8,479,121 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,183
of 48,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,419
of 252,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#245
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,479,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.