↓ Skip to main content

Estimating deaths due to medical error: the ongoing controversy and why it matters: Table 1

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,403)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating deaths due to medical error: the ongoing controversy and why it matters: Table 1
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaveh G Shojania, Mary Dixon-Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 466 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Other 17 14%
Unspecified 11 9%
Other 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 18%
Unspecified 17 14%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Other 19 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#35,567
of 13,877,566 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#19
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,671
of 267,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,877,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.