↓ Skip to main content

Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
110 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Claudia Fichtel, Rose K. Holmes, Peter M. Kappeler, Mark van Vugt, Adrian V. Jaeggi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#620,473
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#531
of 7,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,224
of 447,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.