| Title |
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/alr.22929 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zara M. Patel, Eric H. Holbrook, Justin H. Turner, Nithin D. Adappa, Mark W. Albers, Aytug Altundag, Simone Appenzeller, Richard M. Costanzo, Ilona Croy, Greg E. Davis, Puya Dehgani‐Mobaraki, Richard L. Doty, Valerie B. Duffy, Bradley J. Goldstein, David A. Gudis, Antje Haehner, Thomas S. Higgins, Claire Hopkins, Caroline Huart, Thomas Hummel, Kawinyarat Jitaroon, Robert C. Kern, Ashoke R. Khanwalkar, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Kenji Kondo, Andrew P. Lane, Matt Lechner, Donald A. Leopold, Joshua M. Levy, Michael J. Marmura, Lisha Mclelland, Takaki Miwa, Paul J. Moberg, Christian A. Mueller, Sagar U. Nigwekar, Erin K. O'Brien, Teodor G. Paunescu, Robert Pellegrino, Carl Philpott, Jayant M. Pinto, Evan R. Reiter, David R. Roalf, Nicholas R. Rowan, Rodney J. Schlosser, James Schwob, Allen M. Seiden, Timothy L. Smith, Zachary M. Soler, Leigh Sowerby, Bruce K. Tan, Andrew Thamboo, Bozena Wrobel, Carol H. Yan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 42% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 53% |
| Scientists | 11 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#60,687
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
#6
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,945
of 449,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.