You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Competence not Age Determines Ability to Practice: Ethical Considerations about Sensorimotor Agility, Dexterity, and Cognitive Capacity
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.10.pfor1-1610 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Krista L Kaups |
Abstract |
Consideration of the effects of aging on physicians' practice is crucial to addressing aging clinicians' competence, that is, their ability to practice with reasonable skill and safety. Given physician workforce shortages even in resource abundant countries, the establishment of a compulsory retirement age in the US is impractical and unlikely. Several US hospitals and institutions have sought to address concerns about competence by establishing mandatory age-linked testing and evaluation for physicians. However, these procedures have raised questions regarding age discrimination and test validity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 14% |
Brazil | 3 | 14% |
Colombia | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Israel | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 38% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 24% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 19% |
Philosophy | 2 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,145,078
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,543
of 334,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.