↓ Skip to main content

Newly Identifying Active Glaciers in the Northern Japanese Alps and Their Characteristics (English Translation)

Overview of attention for article published in Geographical Review of Japan Series B, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newly Identifying Active Glaciers in the Northern Japanese Alps and Their Characteristics (English Translation)
Published in
Geographical Review of Japan Series B, December 2021
DOI 10.4157/geogrevjapanb.94.81
Authors

FUKUI Kotaro, IIDA Hajime, KOSAKA Tomoyoshi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#12,505,314
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Geographical Review of Japan Series B
#6
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,384
of 341,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geographical Review of Japan Series B
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them