↓ Skip to main content

FAVR (Filtering and Annotation of Variants that are Rare): methods to facilitate the analysis of rare germline genetic variants from massively parallel sequencing datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FAVR (Filtering and Annotation of Variants that are Rare): methods to facilitate the analysis of rare germline genetic variants from massively parallel sequencing datasets
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard J Pope, Tú Nguyen-Dumont, Fabrice Odefrey, Fleur Hammet, Russell Bell, Kayoko Tao, Sean V Tavtigian, David E Goldgar, Andrew Lonie, Melissa C Southey, Daniel J Park

Abstract

Characterising genetic diversity through the analysis of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) data offers enormous potential to significantly improve our understanding of the genetic basis for observed phenotypes, including predisposition to and progression of complex human disease. Great challenges remain in resolving genetic variants that are genuine from the millions of artefactual signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 4 8%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,181,643
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,857
of 7,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,480
of 193,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#68
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.