↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Drosophila'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using FlyBase, a Database of Drosophila Genes and Genomes.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The GAL4 System: A Versatile System for the Manipulation and Analysis of Gene Expression.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Q-System: A Versatile Expression System for Drosophila.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Analysis of MicroRNA Function in Drosophila.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Methods for High-Throughput RNAi Screening in Drosophila Cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Guide to Genome-Wide In Vivo RNAi Applications in Drosophila.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Creating Heritable Mutations in Drosophila with CRISPR-Cas9.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Performing Chromophore-Assisted Laser Inactivation in Drosophila Embryos Using GFP.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 deGradFP: A System to Knockdown GFP-Tagged Proteins.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Drosophila
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Cultivation and Live Imaging of Drosophila Imaginal Discs.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Cultivation and Live Imaging of Drosophila Ovaries.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of Epithelial Tissues.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Laser Ablation to Probe the Epithelial Mechanics in Drosophila.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Rapid Ovary Mass-Isolation (ROMi) to Obtain Large Quantities of Drosophila Egg Chambers for Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Drosophila
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Protocols to Study Growth and Metabolism in Drosophila.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Protocols to Study Aging in Drosophila.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Protocols to Study Behavior in Drosophila.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Electrophysiological Recordings from Lobula Plate Tangential Cells in Drosophila.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Methods to Establish Drosophila Cell Lines.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Erratum to: The GAL4 System: A Versatile System for the Manipulation and Analysis of Gene Expression
Attention for Chapter 16: Drosophila
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Drosophila
Chapter number 16
Book title
Drosophila
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6369-0, 978-1-4939-6371-3
Authors

Ghavi-Helm, Yad, Zhao, Bingqing, Furlong, Eileen E M, Yad Ghavi-Helm, Bingqing Zhao, Eileen E. M. Furlong

Editors

Christian Dahmann

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) is an invaluable technique to assess transcription factor binding and histone modifications in a genome-wide manner, an essential step towards understanding the mechanisms that govern embryonic development. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for all steps involved in generating a ChIP-seq library, starting from embryo collection, fixation, chromatin preparation, immunoprecipitation, and finally library preparation. The protocol is optimized for Drosophila embryos, but can be easily adapted for any model organism. The resulting library is suitable for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq or MiSeq platform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,475,157
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,926
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,601
of 393,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.