↓ Skip to main content

Giant cyamella: a rare sesamoid bone

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 345)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


3 Dimensions

Readers on

6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Giant cyamella: a rare sesamoid bone
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0240
Pubmed ID

Márcio Luís Duarte, André de Queiroz Pereira Silva, Simone Botelho Alvarenga, José Luiz Masson de Almeida Prado, Luiz Carlos Donoso Scoppetta

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
of 20,747,699 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 187,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,747,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them