You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and trialling of a tool to support a systems approach to improve social determinants of health in rural and remote Australian communities: the healthy community assessment tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-12-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth L McDonald, Ross Bailie, Thomas Michel |
| Abstract |
The residents of many Australian rural and remote communities do not have the essential infrastructure and services required to support healthy living conditions and community members choosing healthy lifestyle options. Improving these social determinants of health is seen to offer real opportunities to improve health among such disadvantaged populations. In this paper, we describe the development and trialling of a tool to measure, monitor and evaluate key social determinants of health at community level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,517
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,499
of 205,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.