You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009569.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng, Yao, Lu, Jiong, Xiong, Xianze, Wu, Sijia, Lin, Yixin, Wu, Taixiang, Cheng, Nansheng |
| Abstract |
Laparoscopic surgery is now widely performed to treat various abdominal diseases. Currently, carbon dioxide is the most frequently used gas for insufflation of the abdominal cavity (pneumoperitoneum). Many other gases have been introduced as alternatives to carbon dioxide for establishing pneumoperitoneum. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 31% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 58% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,265,264
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,773
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,129
of 282,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.