↓ Skip to main content

Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009569.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng, Yao, Lu, Jiong, Xiong, Xianze, Wu, Sijia, Lin, Yixin, Wu, Taixiang, Cheng, Nansheng

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is now widely performed to treat various abdominal diseases. Currently, carbon dioxide is the most frequently used gas for insufflation of the abdominal cavity (pneumoperitoneum). Many other gases have been introduced as alternatives to carbon dioxide for establishing pneumoperitoneum.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 72%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#4,625,346
of 8,612,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,333
of 8,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,606
of 118,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,612,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.