↓ Skip to main content

Germline Stem Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Germline Stem Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Analysis of the C. elegans Germline Stem Cell Pool.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Methods for Studying the Germline of the Human Parasite Schistosoma mansoni.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Evaluation of the Asymmetric Division of Drosophila Male Germline Stem Cells.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Live Imaging of the Drosophila Testis Stem Cell Niche.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 RNA Isolation from Early Drosophila Larval Ovaries.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Live-Cell Imaging of the Adult Drosophila Ovary Using Confocal Microscopy.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Measurement of mRNA Poly(A) Tail Lengths in Drosophila Female Germ Cells and Germ-Line Stem Cells.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Identification of Germ-Line Stem Cells in Zebrafish.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Primordial Germ Cell Isolation from Xenopus laevis Embryos.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Single-Cell Lineage Analysis of Oogenesis in Mice.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Visualization and Lineage Tracing of Pax7(+) Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Mouse.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Transplantation as a Quantitative Assay to Study Mammalian Male Germline Stem Cells.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mouse Fetal Germ Cell Isolation and Culture Techniques.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Rattus norvegicus Spermatogenesis Colony-Forming Assays.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Identification of Mouse piRNA Pathway Components Using Anti-MIWI2 Antibodies.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Efficient Induction and Isolation of Human Primordial Germ Cell-Like Cells from Competent Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Attention for Chapter 1: Analysis of the C. elegans Germline Stem Cell Pool.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of the C. elegans Germline Stem Cell Pool.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Germline Stem Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-4017-2_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-4015-8, 978-1-4939-4017-2
Authors

Sarah L. Crittenden, Hannah S. Seidel, Judith Kimble

Editors

Michael Buszczak

Abstract

The Caenorhabditis elegans germline is an excellent model for studying the regulation of a pool of stem cells and progression of cells from a stem cell state to a differentiated state. At the tissue level, the germline is organized in an assembly line with the germline stem cell (GSC) pool at one end and differentiated cells at the other. A simple mesenchymal niche caps the GSC region of the germline and maintains GSCs in an undifferentiated state by signaling through the conserved Notch pathway. Downstream of Notch signaling, key regulators include novel LST-1 and SYGL-1 proteins and a network of RNA regulatory proteins. In this chapter we present methods for characterizing the C. elegans GSC pool and early germ cell differentiation. The methods include examination of the germline in living and fixed worms, cell cycle analysis, and analysis of markers. We also discuss assays to separate mutants that affect the stem cell vs. differentiation decision from those that affect germ cell processes more generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#12,774,596
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,212
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,101
of 420,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#295
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.