↓ Skip to main content

Importance of regional variation in conservation planning: a rangewide example of the Greater Sage‐Grouse

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Importance of regional variation in conservation planning: a rangewide example of the Greater Sage‐Grouse
Published in
Ecosphere, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1462
Authors

Kevin E. Doherty, Jeffrey S. Evans, Peter S. Coates, Lara M. Juliusson, Bradley C. Fedy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 45%
Environmental Science 15 24%
Computer Science 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#10,189,611
of 15,988,845 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#1,735
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,457
of 296,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#107
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,988,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.