You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome of Fulminant and Acute Myocarditis in Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-11-1032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsutomu Saji, Hiroyuki Matsuura, Kei Hasegawa, Toshio Nishikawa, Eiichi Yamamoto, Hirotaka Ohki, Satoshi Yasukochi, Yoshio Arakaki, Kunio Joo, Makoto Nakazawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 312 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 75 | 24% |
| France | 15 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 308 | 99% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 70% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#179,931
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#7
of 2,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#841
of 255,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.