You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of a Genetic Determinant in Clinical Enterococcus faecium Strains That Contributes to Intestinal Colonization During Antibiotic Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infectious Diseases, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/infdis/jit076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinglin Zhang, Janetta Top, Mark de Been, Damien Bierschenk, Malbert Rogers, Masja Leendertse, Marc J. M. Bonten, Tom van der Poll, Rob J. L. Willems, Willem van Schaik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#7,215
of 14,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,902
of 205,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#44
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.