| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics for Endoscopic Healing of the Ileum and Colon in Crohn's Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neeraj Narula, Emily C.L. Wong, Parambir S. Dulai, John K. Marshall, Vipul Jairath, Walter Reinisch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 40% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#957,364
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#410
of 5,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,520
of 446,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#11
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.