↓ Skip to main content

Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
564 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
797 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000567.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Perel, Ian Roberts, Katharine Ker

Abstract

Colloid solutions are widely used in fluid resuscitation of critically ill patients. There are several choices of colloid, and there is ongoing debate about the relative effectiveness of colloids compared to crystalloid fluids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 797 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 766 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 115 14%
Student > Master 111 14%
Researcher 92 12%
Student > Postgraduate 84 11%
Student > Bachelor 76 10%
Other 206 26%
Unknown 113 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 502 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 56 7%
Unknown 135 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#457,828
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#809
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,905
of 205,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.