↓ Skip to main content

Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006338.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Yang, Yuping Yan, Xiangli Yin, Bin Y Wang, Taixiang Wu, Guan J Liu, Bi Rong Dong

Abstract

Despite conflicting evidence, chest physiotherapy has been widely used as an adjunctive treatment for adults with pneumonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 436 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 97 22%
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 6%
Researcher 23 5%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 143 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 151 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,083,227
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,189
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,673
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.