↓ Skip to main content

Multinutrient fortification of human breast milk for preterm infants following hospital discharge

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multinutrient fortification of human breast milk for preterm infants following hospital discharge
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004866.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Young, Nicholas D Embleton, Felicia M McCormick, William McGuire

Abstract

Preterm infants are usually growth restricted at hospital discharge. Feeding preterm infants after hospital discharge with multinutrient fortified breast milk rather than unfortified breast milk may facilitate more rapid catch-up growth and improve neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 9 7%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#776,054
of 13,740,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,445
of 10,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,714
of 145,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,740,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.