You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Cardiovascular Catheterization and Intervention With High-Dose Strong Statin Therapy in Japan ― The PREVENT CINC-J Study ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Watanabe, Kazutaka Aonuma, Toyoaki Murohara, Yasuo Okumura, Takeshi Morimoto, Sadanori Okada, Sunao Nakamura, Shiro Uemura, Koichiro Kuwahara, Tadateru Takayama, Naofumi Doi, Tamio Nakajima, Manabu Horii, Kenichi Ishigami, Kazumiki Nomoto, Daisuke Abe, Koji Oiwa, Kentaro Tanaka, Terumasa Koyama, Akira Sato, Tomoya Ueda, Tsunenari Soeda, Yoshihiko Saito |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,492,558
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#962
of 1,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,998
of 433,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.