↓ Skip to main content

Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004294.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Crocker, Anne Forster, John Young, Lesley Brown, Seline Ozer, Jane Smith, John Green, Jo Hardy, Eileen Burns, Elizabeth Glidewell, Darren C Greenwood

Abstract

The worldwide population is progressively ageing, with an expected increase in morbidity and demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects on long-term care residents. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 462 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 15%
Student > Bachelor 70 14%
Unspecified 60 12%
Researcher 50 10%
Other 131 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 185 38%
Unspecified 87 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 15%
Psychology 30 6%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Other 88 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,820,787
of 12,602,745 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,495
of 10,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,986
of 143,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,602,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.