The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||19||56%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||8||24%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||14%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||7%|
|Student > Master||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||50%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 431,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.