You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of pharmacist‐provided non‐dispensing services on patient outcomes, health service utilisation and costs in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sami Pande, Janet E Hiller, Nancy Nkansah, Lisa Bero |
| Abstract |
The role of pharmacists has expanded beyond dispensing and packaging over the past two decades, and now includes ensuring rational use of drugs, improving clinical outcomes and promoting health status by working with the public and other healthcare professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 629 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Mali | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 607 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 111 | 18% |
| Researcher | 75 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 10% |
| Other | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 109 | 17% |
| Unknown | 168 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 64 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Psychology | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Unknown | 200 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,670,155
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,553
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,589
of 205,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.