The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Innovations that harm: tobacco product and packaging in low-income and middle-income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Innovations, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000865 |
Authors |
Jennifer L Brown, Katherine Clegg Smith, Kevin Welding, Joaquin Barnoya, Joanna E Cohen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 13% |
India | 2 | 9% |
Chile | 2 | 9% |
Guatemala | 2 | 9% |
Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
Scientists | 7 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,596,555
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Innovations
#38
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,520
of 452,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Innovations
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.