You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vascular plant checklist in an area of extreme biological importance: filling gaps in the Caparaó National Park-ES, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2020-1024 |
| Authors |
Eduardo Alves Araújo, Sustanis Horn Kunz, Henrique Machado Dias, João Paulo Fernandes Zorzanelli, Rafael Marian Callegaro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#22
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,397
of 502,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.