You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phylogenetic inference under varying proportions of indel-induced alignment gaps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-9-211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bhakti Dwivedi, Sudhindra R Gadagkar |
| Abstract |
The effect of alignment gaps on phylogenetic accuracy has been the subject of numerous studies. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the total number of gapped sites and phylogenetic accuracy, when the gaps were introduced (by means of computer simulation) to reflect indel (insertion/deletion) events during the evolution of DNA sequences. The resulting (true) alignments were subjected to commonly used gap treatment and phylogenetic inference methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 30% |
| Researcher | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,267
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,044
of 107,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#39
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.