↓ Skip to main content

Gaining the PROMIS perspective from children with nephrotic syndrome: a Midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaining the PROMIS perspective from children with nephrotic syndrome: a Midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debbie S Gipson, David T Selewski, Susan F Massengill, Larysa Wickman, Kassandra L Messer, Emily Herreshoff, Bowers Corinna, Maria E Ferris, John D Mahan, Larry A Greenbaum, Jackie MacHardy, Gaurav Kapur, Deepa H Chand, Jens Goebel, Gina Barletta, Denis Geary, David B Kershaw, Cynthia G Pan, Rasheed Gbadegesin, Guillermo Hidalgo, Jerome C Lane, Jeffrey D Leiser, Brett W Plattner, Peter X Song, David Thissen, Yang Liu, Heather E Gross, Darren A DeWalt

Abstract

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) represents a common disease in pediatric nephrology typified by a relapsing and remitting course and characterized by the presence of edema that can significantly affect the health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. The PROMIS pediatric measures were constructed to be publically available, efficient, precise, and valid across a variety of diseases to assess patient reports of symptoms and quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of children and adolescents with NS to complete the PROMIS assessment via computer and to initiate validity assessments of the short forms and full item banks in pediatric NS. Successful measurement of patient reported outcomes will contribute to our understanding of the impact of NS on children and adolescents.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Psychology 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Computer Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,847,838
of 16,046,747 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#777
of 1,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,084
of 152,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,046,747 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them