↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for ankle sprain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture for ankle sprain: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jimin Park, Seokyung Hahn, Ji-Yeun Park, Hi-Joon Park, Hyangsook Lee

Abstract

Ankle sprain is one of the most frequently encountered musculoskeletal injuries; however, the efficacy of acupuncture in treating ankle sprains remains uncertain. We therefore performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence regarding acupuncture for ankle sprains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 142 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 24%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Other 10 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,412,983
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#436
of 3,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,872
of 200,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#9
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.