↓ Skip to main content

Individual and group based parenting programmes for improving psychosocial outcomes for teenage parents and their children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual and group based parenting programmes for improving psychosocial outcomes for teenage parents and their children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002964.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Nadja Smailagic, Cathy Bennett, Nick Huband, Hannah Jones, Esther Coren

Abstract

Parenting programmes are a potentially important means of supporting teenage parents and improving outcomes for their children, and parenting support is a priority across most Western countries. This review updates the previous version published in 2001.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 255 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Unspecified 28 11%
Other 66 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 23%
Social Sciences 59 23%
Psychology 59 23%
Unspecified 41 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Other 21 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,850,530
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,640
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,077
of 129,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.