You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clonal Hematopoiesis Is Associated with Increased Risk of Severe Neurotoxicity in Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Therapy of Large B-Cell Lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood Cancer Discovery, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neeraj Y. Saini, David M. Swoboda, Uri Greenbaum, Junsheng Ma, Romil D. Patel, Kartik Devashish, Kaberi Das, Mark R. Tanner, Paolo Strati, Ranjit Nair, Luis Fayad, Sairah Ahmed, Hun Ju Lee, Swaminathan P. Iyer, Raphael Steiner, Nitin Jain, Loretta Nastoupil, Sanam Loghavi, Guilin Tang, Roland L. Bassett, Preetesh Jain, Michael Wang, Jason R. Westin, Michael R. Green, David A. Sallman, Eric Padron, Marco L. Davila, Frederick L. Locke, Richard E. Champlin, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Partow Kebriaei, Christopher R. Flowers, Michael D. Jain, Feng Wang, Andrew P. Futreal, Nancy Gillis, Sattva S. Neelapu, Koichi Takahashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 49% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 44% |
| Scientists | 17 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#632,734
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#27
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,271
of 446,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.