↓ Skip to main content

英語論文の採択確率を上げるためにできること(<特集>国際会議に通すための英語論文執筆)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 319)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
英語論文の採択確率を上げるためにできること(<特集>国際会議に通すための英語論文執筆)
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, September 2020
DOI 10.11517/jjsai.23.3_373
Authors

松尾 豊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,130,076
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#14
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,769
of 435,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
#4
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.