| Title |
The motivation–impact gap in pro-environmental clothing consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-022-00888-7 |
| Authors |
Kristian S. Nielsen, Cameron Brick, Wilhelm Hofmann, Tina Joanes, Florian Lange, Wencke Gwozdz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 15% |
| United States | 29 | 14% |
| Germany | 11 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 4% |
| Finland | 5 | 2% |
| Sweden | 5 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 50% |
| Scientists | 86 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#271,130
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#257
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,696
of 447,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#8
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.