↓ Skip to main content

GECOP-MMC: phase IV randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mytomicin-C after complete surgical cytoreduction in patients with…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GECOP-MMC: phase IV randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mytomicin-C after complete surgical cytoreduction in patients with colon cancer peritoneal metastases
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12885-022-09572-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Pereira, Angel Serrano, Israel Manzanedo, Estibalitz Pérez-Viejo, Santiago González-Moreno, Luis González-Bayón, Alvaro Arjona-Sánchez, Juan Torres, Isabel Ramos, Maria E. Barrios, Pedro Cascales, Rafael Morales, Enrique Boldó, Alfonso García-Fadrique, Xabier Arteaga, Alberto Gutierrez-Calvo, Susana Sánchez-García, Enrique Asensio, Cesar P. Ramírez, Manuel Artiles, Javier Vaqué, Pedro A. Parra, Pedro Villarejo, Cristóbal Muñoz-Casares, Estrella Turienzo, Alicia Calero, Isabel Jaén Torrejimeno, Isabel Prieto, Julio Galindo, Vicente Borrego, Manuel E. Marcello, Cristina Rihuete, Joaquin Carrasco, Luis Gomez-Quiles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 21 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,201,106
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#158
of 8,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,615
of 443,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#5
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.