↓ Skip to main content

Bone health comparison in seven Asian countries using calcaneal ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bone health comparison in seven Asian countries using calcaneal ultrasound
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlena C Kruger, Joanne M Todd, Linda M Schollum, Barbara Kuhn-Sherlock, Drew W McLean, Kim Wylie

Abstract

Bone density measurements by DXA are not feasible for large population studies, whereas portable ultrasound heel scanners can provide a practical way of assessing bone health status. The purpose of this study was to assess bone health in seven Asian countries using heel ultrasound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,570,412
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,184
of 4,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,355
of 196,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#47
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.