You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bone health comparison in seven Asian countries using calcaneal ultrasound
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-81 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marlena C Kruger, Joanne M Todd, Linda M Schollum, Barbara Kuhn-Sherlock, Drew W McLean, Kim Wylie |
Abstract |
Bone density measurements by DXA are not feasible for large population studies, whereas portable ultrasound heel scanners can provide a practical way of assessing bone health status. The purpose of this study was to assess bone health in seven Asian countries using heel ultrasound. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 21% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,570,412
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,184
of 4,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,355
of 196,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#47
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.