↓ Skip to main content

Azacitidine vs. Decitabine in Unfit Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from the PETHEMA Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Cancers, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Azacitidine vs. Decitabine in Unfit Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from the PETHEMA Registry
Published in
Cancers, May 2022
DOI 10.3390/cancers14092342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Labrador, David Martínez-Cuadrón, Adolfo de la Fuente, Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga, Josefina Serrano, Mar Tormo, Eduardo Rodriguez-Arboli, Fernando Ramos, Teresa Bernal, María López-Pavía, Fernanda Trigo, María Pilar Martínez-Sánchez, Juan-Ignacio Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Carlos Rodríguez-Medina, Cristina Gil, Daniel García Belmonte, Susana Vives, María-Ángeles Foncillas, Manuel Pérez-Encinas, Andrés Novo, Isabel Recio, Gabriela Rodríguez-Macías, Juan Miguel Bergua, Víctor Noriega, Esperanza Lavilla, Alicia Roldán-Pérez, Miguel A. Sanz, Pau Montesinos, on behalf of PETHEMA Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,401,298
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Cancers
#1,245
of 13,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,092
of 443,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancers
#59
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.