| Title |
Comparison of pulmonary function test, diffusion capacity, blood gas analysis and CT scan in patients with and without persistent respiratory symptoms following COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12890-022-01987-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antje Lehmann, Maximilian Gysan, Dominik Bernitzky, Christina Bal, Helmut Prosch, Sonja Zehetmayer, Ruxandra-Iulia Milos, Karin Vonbank, Wolfgang Pohl, Marco Idzko, Daniela Gompelmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Austria | 3 | 5% |
| Finland | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,439,983
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#56
of 2,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,408
of 447,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#3
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.