You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acting Optimally for Biodiversity in a World Obsessed with REDD+
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12018 |
| Authors |
Oscar Venter, Lex Hovani, Michael Bode, Hugh Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 6% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 62 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,474,770
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#724
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,293
of 212,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.