↓ Skip to main content

Acting Optimally for Biodiversity in a World Obsessed with REDD+

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acting Optimally for Biodiversity in a World Obsessed with REDD+
Published in
Conservation Letters, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/conl.12018
Authors

Oscar Venter, Lex Hovani, Michael Bode, Hugh Possingham, Venter, Oscar, Hovani, Lex, Bode, Michael, Possingham, Hugh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 5%
United States 3 3%
Australia 3 3%
Italy 3 3%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 88 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 55 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Unspecified 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#860,906
of 9,728,255 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#343
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 124,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,728,255 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them