You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coseismic rupturing stopped by Aso volcano during the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aah4629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Lin, T. Satsukawa, M. Wang, Z. Mohammadi Asl, R. Fueta, F. Nakajima |
| Abstract |
Field investigations and seismic data show that the 16 April 2016 moment magnitude (Mw) 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake produced a ~40-kilometer-long surface rupture zone along the northeast-southwest-striking Hinagu-Futagawa strike-slip fault zone and newly identified faults on the western side of Aso caldera, Kyushu Island, Japan. The coseismic surface ruptures cut Aso caldera, including two volcanic cones inside it, but terminate therein. The data show that northeastward propagation of coseismic rupturing terminated in Aso caldera because of the presence of magma beneath the Aso volcanic cluster. The seismogenic faults of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake may require reassessment of the volcanic hazard in the vicinity of Aso volcano. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 38 | 19% |
| United States | 22 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 172 | 85% |
| Scientists | 23 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 73 | 65% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#117,702
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,771
of 83,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,373
of 323,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#60
of 1,150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.