↓ Skip to main content

Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
258 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
570 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Florence B Victoriano, Lee D Smythe, Nina Gloriani-Barzaga, Lolita L Cavinta, Takeshi Kasai, Khanchit Limpakarnjanarat, Bee Lee Ong, Gyanendra Gongal, Julie Hall, Caroline Anne Coulombe, Yasutake Yanagihara, Shin-ichi Yoshida, Ben Adler

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic infection that has been recognized for decades, but the problem of the disease has not been fully addressed, particularly in resource-poor, developing countries, where the major burden of the disease occurs. This paper presents an overview of the current situation of leptospirosis in the region. It describes the current trends in the epidemiology of leptospirosis, the existing surveillance systems, and presents the existing prevention and control programs in the Asia Pacific region.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 555 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 16%
Student > Master 90 16%
Student > Bachelor 71 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 9%
Student > Postgraduate 33 6%
Other 112 20%
Unknown 119 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 34 6%
Environmental Science 32 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 4%
Other 93 16%
Unknown 142 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,675,515
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,525
of 7,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,058
of 91,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.