You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
qDTY12.1: a locus with a consistent effect on grain yield under drought in rice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-14-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna Kumar Mishra, Prashant Vikram, Ram Baran Yadaw, BP Mallikarjuna Swamy, Shalabh Dixit, Ma Teresa Sta Cruz, Paul Maturan, Shailesh Marker, Arvind Kumar |
| Abstract |
Selection for grain yield under drought is an efficient criterion for improving the drought tolerance of rice. Recently, some drought-tolerant rice varieties have been developed using this selection criterion and successfully released for cultivation in drought-prone target environments. The process can be made more efficient and rapid through marker-assisted breeding, a well-known fast-track approach in crop improvement. QTLs have been identified for grain yield under drought with large effects against drought-susceptible varieties. Most of the identified QTLs show large QTL × environment or QTL × genetic background interactions. The development of mapping populations in the background of popular high-yielding varieties, screening across environments, including the target environments, and the identification of QTLs with a consistent effect across environments can be a suitable alternative marker-assisted breeding strategy. An IR74371-46-1-1 × Sabitri backcross inbred line population was screened for reproductive-stage drought stress at the International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, and Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nepalgunj, Nepal, in the dry and wet seasons of 2011, respectively. A bulk segregant analysis approach was used to identify markers associated with high grain yield under drought. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Benin | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 34% |
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#157
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,611
of 205,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.