↓ Skip to main content

Serum folate predicts muscle strength: a pilot cross-sectional study of the association between serum vitamin levels and muscle strength and gait measures in patients >65 years old with diabetes…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum folate predicts muscle strength: a pilot cross-sectional study of the association between serum vitamin levels and muscle strength and gait measures in patients >65 years old with diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12937-016-0208-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Kien Han Wee

Abstract

Old age and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for vitamin deficiencies, weakness and falls. Deficiencies of vitamin D, and possibly vitamin B12 and folate (which are associated with hyperhomocysteinaemia), contribute to sarcopenia. Determination of the physical effects of vitamin deficiencies in specific groups of people can help to guide public health policy with regard to vitamin supplementation. A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the association of levels of vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate and homocysteine with muscle strength, gait and fall history in 56 patients >65 years old with diabetes mellitus in primary care in Singapore. Hand-grip and leg-quadriceps strength measures were obtained and divided by body mass index (BMI). The timed up-and-go and Tinetti tests were used to measure gait. A history of "at least one fall in the preceding year" was obtained. Vitamin B12 deficiency (<150 pmol/l) was present in 43 % of patients, folate deficiency (<13.5 mmol/l) in 20 %, hyperhomocysteinaemia (≥15.0 μmol/l) in 52 % and vitamin D deficiency (<49.9 nmol/l) in 25 %. Levels of vitamin D, vitamin B12 and homocysteine did not significantly predict muscle strength in regression analyses. Folate (B = 0.010, P < 0.01) and gender (B = 0.356, P < 0.001) predicted average grip strength corrected for BMI (F(2,53) = 17.74, P < 0.001, R (2) = 0.40) Folate (B = 0.011, P < 0.05) and gender (B = 0.367, P < 0.001) also predicted average leg quadriceps strength corrected for BMI (F(2,53) = 9.79, P < 0.001, R (2) = 0.27). Average leg strength and average leg strength corrected for BMI were both negatively associated with the risk of having fallen in the preceding year (odds ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95 % CI 0.80-0.98, P < 0.05 and OR = 0.12, 95 % CI 0.02-0.92, P < 0.05, respectively). The prevalence of vitamin deficiency was very high in our sample of patients >65 years old with diabetes mellitus. Folate levels were significantly correlated with grip and leg strength (with correction for BMI). Leg strength was positively correlated with gait measures and negatively correlated with a history of falls. The role of folate in muscle weakness and falls warrants further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 47 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,234,467
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,096
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,964
of 322,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.