↓ Skip to main content

Bypassing birthing centres for child birth: a community-based study in rural Chitwan Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bypassing birthing centres for child birth: a community-based study in rural Chitwan Nepal
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1848-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajani Shah

Abstract

Child delivery in a health facility is important to reduce maternal mortality. Bypassing nearby birthing facility to deliver at a hospital is common in developing countries including Nepal. Very little is known about the extent and determinants of bypassing the birthing centres in Nepal. This study measures the status of bypassing, characteristics of bypassers and their reasons for bypassing. A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in six rural village development committees of Chitwan district of Nepal. Structured interviews were conducted with 263 mothers who had given birth at a health facility and whose nearest facility was a birthing centre. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. More than half of the mothers had bypassed the nearer birthing centres to deliver at hospital. Living in plain area [aOR: 2.467; 95 % CI: 1.005-6.058], higher wealth index [aOR: 4.981; 95 % CI: 2.482-9.999], advantaged caste/ethnicity [aOR: 2.172; 95 % CI: 1.153-4.089], older age [aOR: 2.222; 95 % CI: 1.050-4.703] and first birth [aOR: 2.032; 95 % CI: 1.060-3.894] were associated with higher likelihood of bypassing. Among the reasons of bypassing as reported by the bypassers, lack of operation, video x-ray, and blood test facilities were the most common ones, followed by the lack of medicines/drugs and equipment, lack of skilled service provider, and inadequate physical facilities, among others. Quality of service at the birthing centres needs to be given a high consideration to increase their use as well as to ensure an equitable access to the quality care by all.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Unspecified 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,346,264
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,122
of 7,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,561
of 316,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#140
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.