↓ Skip to main content

The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Global Health Journal, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,288)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12306 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
11 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
Published in
BMJ Global Health Journal, May 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Bardosh, Alex de Figueiredo, Rachel Gur-Arie, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, James Doidge, Trudo Lemmens, Salmaan Keshavjee, Janice E Graham, Stefan Baral

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,306 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5861. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#507
of 21,425,694 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#1
of 2,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18
of 271,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,425,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.