↓ Skip to main content

Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 5,273)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
257 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
770 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashraf Fawzy, Tianshi David Wu, Kunbo Wang, Matthew L. Robinson, Jad Farha, Amanda Bradke, Sherita H. Golden, Yanxun Xu, Brian T. Garibaldi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 770 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Unspecified 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 38 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Unspecified 13 12%
Engineering 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 41 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,054
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#38
of 5,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103
of 429,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.