You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2022
Ashraf Fawzy, Tianshi David Wu, Kunbo Wang, Matthew L. Robinson, Jad Farha, Amanda Bradke, Sherita H. Golden, Yanxun Xu, Brian T. Garibaldi
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 770 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||551||72%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||88||11%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||20||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||8||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||24||22%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||5%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
of 5,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 429,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.